DraftInternalISO 9001ISO 14001ISO 27001

SW-IMS-FRM-002

Improvement Suggestion Form

Version

1.0

Owner

IMS Coordinator

Effective Date

TBD

Review Date

TBD

Improvement Suggestion Form

Purpose

This form enables all Swedwise staff to submit ideas for improving our processes, systems, services, or working environment. All suggestions are valued as part of our commitment to continual improvement and our learning organization culture.

Instructions

  1. Anyone can submit: All employees, contractors, and stakeholders can suggest improvements
  2. Be specific: Clearly describe the current situation and your suggested improvement
  3. Think broadly: Suggestions can relate to quality, environmental, security, efficiency, customer satisfaction, or staff well-being
  4. Submit promptly: Don't wait for perfection—submit ideas as they arise
  5. Follow up: You'll receive feedback on your suggestion within [TBD - e.g., 10 working days]

Submission Information

Field Details
Submission Date [YYYY-MM-DD]
Submitter Name
Department/Role
Email
Prefer to remain anonymous? [ ] Yes [ ] No

Improvement Suggestion

1. Area/Process Affected

Which area does this suggestion relate to?

  • Quality Management (customer satisfaction, service delivery, quality controls)
  • Environmental Management (energy use, waste, travel, environmental impact)
  • Information Security (data protection, access control, security practices)
  • Internal Processes (efficiency, communication, collaboration)
  • Tools/Systems (software, equipment, infrastructure)
  • Training/Competence (skills development, knowledge sharing)
  • Health & Safety (workplace safety, well-being)
  • Customer Experience (onboarding, support, communication)
  • Other: _______________________

Specific process/system/area:

[Please specify, e.g., "Customer onboarding process", "Weekly team meetings", "Expense reporting system", "Office recycling"]

2. Current Situation

Describe the current state:

[What is the current process/situation? What challenges or inefficiencies exist?]

What problem or opportunity does this address?

[Why is change needed? What prompted this suggestion?]

3. Suggested Improvement

Describe your proposed improvement:

[What specifically do you suggest changing? Be as detailed as practical.]

How would this improvement work in practice?

[Describe the improved process/state. What would change day-to-day?]

4. Expected Benefits

What benefits would this improvement deliver?

  • Improved customer satisfaction
  • Increased efficiency/time savings
  • Cost reduction
  • Better quality outcomes
  • Reduced environmental impact
  • Enhanced security/compliance
  • Improved staff satisfaction/well-being
  • Reduced risk
  • Better collaboration/communication
  • Other: _______________________

Quantify if possible:

[e.g., "Save 2 hours per week", "Reduce travel by 10%", "Prevent 5 customer queries per month"]

5. Implementation Considerations

What would be needed to implement this? (optional—your best guess)

Consideration Details
Resources Required [e.g., Software license, training, equipment]
Estimated Cost [If known]
Who should be involved? [Teams, roles, or individuals]
Timing [Any urgency or preferred timing?]

6. Supporting Information

Additional context or examples: (optional)

[Anything else that would help evaluate this suggestion? Examples from other companies? Related documents?]


For IMS Coordinator/Management Use Only

Initial Assessment

Field Details
Suggestion ID [Auto-assigned: IMP-YYYY-NNN]
Received Date
Assigned To
Initial Review Date
Priority [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low

Evaluation

Feasibility:

  • Feasible - can be implemented as suggested
  • Feasible with modifications
  • Not currently feasible - explain below
  • Requires further investigation

Alignment with IMS objectives:

  • Strongly aligned
  • Aligned
  • Neutral
  • Not aligned - explain below

Decision:

  • Approved - proceed with implementation
  • Approved with modifications - see notes
  • Deferred - revisit on: __________
  • Declined - see rationale

Decision Notes/Rationale:

[Explain decision, especially if declined or deferred. If approved with modifications, describe changes.]

Implementation Tracking

Field Details
Implementation Owner
Target Completion Date
Resources Allocated
Actual Completion Date
Effectiveness Verified? [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Pending

Feedback to Submitter

Feedback Provided Date: __________

Feedback Method: [ ] Email [ ] Meeting [ ] Anonymous acknowledgment [ ] Other: _____

Summary of feedback given:

[Record what was communicated to the submitter about their suggestion]


Submitter Recognition

If implemented, was the submitter recognized?

  • Public recognition (team meeting, newsletter)
  • Personal thank you from management
  • Included in performance review/development discussion
  • Submitter requested anonymity - no public recognition
  • Other: _______________________

Notes for Users

Why Suggest Improvements?

At Swedwise, we believe the people doing the work often have the best ideas for improving it. Your suggestions:

  • Drive our continuous improvement culture
  • Help us work more efficiently (Make Time For The Good!)
  • Improve customer satisfaction
  • Reduce environmental impact
  • Enhance security and compliance
  • Make Swedwise a better place to work

What Makes a Good Suggestion?

  • Specific: Clearly identifies what to change
  • Actionable: Provides enough detail to evaluate and implement
  • Benefit-focused: Explains the value of the change
  • Constructive: Focuses on solutions, not just problems

What Happens Next?

  1. Acknowledgment: You'll receive confirmation within 2 working days
  2. Initial Review: IMS Coordinator/relevant manager reviews within 10 working days
  3. Evaluation: Feasibility, cost, and alignment with objectives assessed
  4. Decision: You'll be informed of the decision and rationale
  5. Implementation: If approved, the improvement is planned and executed
  6. Follow-up: Effectiveness is verified and you're updated on results

Can I Submit Anonymously?

Yes. If you prefer anonymity, we'll acknowledge and evaluate your suggestion without identifying you. However, we may not be able to provide detailed feedback or recognize your contribution publicly.


Document Control

Version Date Author Changes Approved By
1.0 [TBD] IMS Coordinator Initial template creation [TBD]

Next Review Date: [TBD]

Document Classification: Internal

Document Owner: IMS Coordinator