SW-IMS-FRM-002
Improvement Suggestion Form
Version
1.0
Owner
IMS Coordinator
Effective Date
TBD
Review Date
TBD
Improvement Suggestion Form
Purpose
This form enables all Swedwise staff to submit ideas for improving our processes, systems, services, or working environment. All suggestions are valued as part of our commitment to continual improvement and our learning organization culture.
Instructions
- Anyone can submit: All employees, contractors, and stakeholders can suggest improvements
- Be specific: Clearly describe the current situation and your suggested improvement
- Think broadly: Suggestions can relate to quality, environmental, security, efficiency, customer satisfaction, or staff well-being
- Submit promptly: Don't wait for perfection—submit ideas as they arise
- Follow up: You'll receive feedback on your suggestion within [TBD - e.g., 10 working days]
Submission Information
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Submission Date | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Submitter Name | |
| Department/Role | |
| Prefer to remain anonymous? | [ ] Yes [ ] No |
Improvement Suggestion
1. Area/Process Affected
Which area does this suggestion relate to?
- Quality Management (customer satisfaction, service delivery, quality controls)
- Environmental Management (energy use, waste, travel, environmental impact)
- Information Security (data protection, access control, security practices)
- Internal Processes (efficiency, communication, collaboration)
- Tools/Systems (software, equipment, infrastructure)
- Training/Competence (skills development, knowledge sharing)
- Health & Safety (workplace safety, well-being)
- Customer Experience (onboarding, support, communication)
- Other: _______________________
Specific process/system/area:
[Please specify, e.g., "Customer onboarding process", "Weekly team meetings", "Expense reporting system", "Office recycling"]
2. Current Situation
Describe the current state:
[What is the current process/situation? What challenges or inefficiencies exist?]
What problem or opportunity does this address?
[Why is change needed? What prompted this suggestion?]
3. Suggested Improvement
Describe your proposed improvement:
[What specifically do you suggest changing? Be as detailed as practical.]
How would this improvement work in practice?
[Describe the improved process/state. What would change day-to-day?]
4. Expected Benefits
What benefits would this improvement deliver?
- Improved customer satisfaction
- Increased efficiency/time savings
- Cost reduction
- Better quality outcomes
- Reduced environmental impact
- Enhanced security/compliance
- Improved staff satisfaction/well-being
- Reduced risk
- Better collaboration/communication
- Other: _______________________
Quantify if possible:
[e.g., "Save 2 hours per week", "Reduce travel by 10%", "Prevent 5 customer queries per month"]
5. Implementation Considerations
What would be needed to implement this? (optional—your best guess)
| Consideration | Details |
|---|---|
| Resources Required | [e.g., Software license, training, equipment] |
| Estimated Cost | [If known] |
| Who should be involved? | [Teams, roles, or individuals] |
| Timing | [Any urgency or preferred timing?] |
6. Supporting Information
Additional context or examples: (optional)
[Anything else that would help evaluate this suggestion? Examples from other companies? Related documents?]
For IMS Coordinator/Management Use Only
Initial Assessment
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Suggestion ID | [Auto-assigned: IMP-YYYY-NNN] |
| Received Date | |
| Assigned To | |
| Initial Review Date | |
| Priority | [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
Evaluation
Feasibility:
- Feasible - can be implemented as suggested
- Feasible with modifications
- Not currently feasible - explain below
- Requires further investigation
Alignment with IMS objectives:
- Strongly aligned
- Aligned
- Neutral
- Not aligned - explain below
Decision:
- Approved - proceed with implementation
- Approved with modifications - see notes
- Deferred - revisit on: __________
- Declined - see rationale
Decision Notes/Rationale:
[Explain decision, especially if declined or deferred. If approved with modifications, describe changes.]
Implementation Tracking
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Implementation Owner | |
| Target Completion Date | |
| Resources Allocated | |
| Actual Completion Date | |
| Effectiveness Verified? | [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Pending |
Feedback to Submitter
Feedback Provided Date: __________
Feedback Method: [ ] Email [ ] Meeting [ ] Anonymous acknowledgment [ ] Other: _____
Summary of feedback given:
[Record what was communicated to the submitter about their suggestion]
Submitter Recognition
If implemented, was the submitter recognized?
- Public recognition (team meeting, newsletter)
- Personal thank you from management
- Included in performance review/development discussion
- Submitter requested anonymity - no public recognition
- Other: _______________________
Notes for Users
Why Suggest Improvements?
At Swedwise, we believe the people doing the work often have the best ideas for improving it. Your suggestions:
- Drive our continuous improvement culture
- Help us work more efficiently (Make Time For The Good!)
- Improve customer satisfaction
- Reduce environmental impact
- Enhance security and compliance
- Make Swedwise a better place to work
What Makes a Good Suggestion?
- Specific: Clearly identifies what to change
- Actionable: Provides enough detail to evaluate and implement
- Benefit-focused: Explains the value of the change
- Constructive: Focuses on solutions, not just problems
What Happens Next?
- Acknowledgment: You'll receive confirmation within 2 working days
- Initial Review: IMS Coordinator/relevant manager reviews within 10 working days
- Evaluation: Feasibility, cost, and alignment with objectives assessed
- Decision: You'll be informed of the decision and rationale
- Implementation: If approved, the improvement is planned and executed
- Follow-up: Effectiveness is verified and you're updated on results
Can I Submit Anonymously?
Yes. If you prefer anonymity, we'll acknowledge and evaluate your suggestion without identifying you. However, we may not be able to provide detailed feedback or recognize your contribution publicly.
Document Control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | [TBD] | IMS Coordinator | Initial template creation | [TBD] |
Next Review Date: [TBD]
Document Classification: Internal
Document Owner: IMS Coordinator