SW-QMS-FRM-003
Project Status Report Template
Version
1.0
Owner
Quality Lead
Effective Date
TBD
Review Date
TBD
Project Status Report Template
Instructions
This form provides a standardized format for reporting project status to internal stakeholders and customers. It uses the RAG (Red-Amber-Green) traffic light system for quick visual assessment of project health.
When to Use:
- Weekly or bi-weekly for active implementation projects
- Monthly for longer-term strategic projects
- Before steering committee or management review meetings
- When project status changes significantly
How to Complete:
- Update the status indicators (RAG) honestly based on current situation
- Focus on significant accomplishments and issues, not minor details
- Highlight decisions needed from stakeholders
- Keep the report concise - aim for 1-2 pages
- Review with project sponsor before distributing
- Store in project documentation repository
Responsible: Project Manager
Project Status Report
Project Information
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Project Name* | [Project Name] |
| Customer* | [Customer Organization] |
| Report Date* | [Date] |
| Reporting Period* | [Start Date] to [End Date] |
| Project Manager* | [Name] |
| Project ID | [Reference Number] |
| Project Start Date | [Date] |
| Planned Completion Date | [Date] |
| Forecast Completion Date | [Date] |
Executive Summary
Overall Project Status (select one):
- Green - On track, no significant issues
- Yellow - At risk, issues being actively managed
- Red - Off track, significant intervention required
Summary in 2-3 sentences:
Detailed Status
Schedule Status
RAG Status: [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Planned Completion | [Date] |
| Forecast Completion | [Date] |
| Variance | [Days/Weeks ahead/behind] |
| Schedule Performance Index (SPI) | [Value - >1.0 is ahead, <1.0 is behind] |
Schedule Commentary:
Budget Status
RAG Status: [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Budget | [Amount] SEK |
| Budget Spent to Date | [Amount] SEK ([%]%) |
| Forecast Total Cost | [Amount] SEK |
| Variance | [Amount] SEK ([%]% over/under) |
| Cost Performance Index (CPI) | [Value - >1.0 is under budget, <1.0 is over budget] |
Budget Commentary:
Scope Status
RAG Status: [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Original Scope Items | [Number] |
| Completed Scope Items | [Number] |
| In Progress | [Number] |
| Not Started | [Number] |
| Change Requests | [Number pending/approved/rejected] |
Scope Commentary:
Quality Status
RAG Status: [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Deliverables Accepted | [Number] / [Total] |
| Defects Open | [Number] |
| Customer Satisfaction | [ ] Very Satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] Neutral [ ] Dissatisfied |
Quality Commentary:
Key Accomplishments This Period
List the most significant achievements during the reporting period:
Milestones
| Milestone | Planned Date | Forecast Date | Status | RAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] Not Started [ ] In Progress [ ] Complete |
[ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
|||
| [ ] Not Started [ ] In Progress [ ] Complete |
[ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
|||
| [ ] Not Started [ ] In Progress [ ] Complete |
[ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
|||
| [ ] Not Started [ ] In Progress [ ] Complete |
[ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
|||
| [ ] Not Started [ ] In Progress [ ] Complete |
[ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
Issues and Risks
Active Issues
| Issue ID | Description | Impact | Owner | Status | RAG | Resolution Plan / Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] Critical [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] New [ ] In Progress [ ] Resolved |
[ ] Red [ ] Yellow [ ] Green |
||||
| [ ] Critical [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] New [ ] In Progress [ ] Resolved |
[ ] Red [ ] Yellow [ ] Green |
||||
| [ ] Critical [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] New [ ] In Progress [ ] Resolved |
[ ] Red [ ] Yellow [ ] Green |
Top Risks
| Risk ID | Description | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation Strategy | Owner | RAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] Red [ ] Yellow [ ] Green |
||||
| [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] Red [ ] Yellow [ ] Green |
||||
| [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low |
[ ] Red [ ] Yellow [ ] Green |
Critical Issues Requiring Escalation:
Upcoming Activities (Next Period)
Planned Activities:
Expected Deliverables:
| Deliverable | Target Date | Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Dependencies and Blockers
Customer Dependencies:
| Dependency | Required By | Status | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] On Track [ ] At Risk [ ] Overdue | [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red | ||
| [ ] On Track [ ] At Risk [ ] Overdue | [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
Internal Dependencies:
| Dependency | Required By | Status | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] On Track [ ] At Risk [ ] Overdue | [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red | ||
| [ ] On Track [ ] At Risk [ ] Overdue | [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
Third-Party Dependencies:
| Dependency | Required By | Status | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] On Track [ ] At Risk [ ] Overdue | [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red | ||
| [ ] On Track [ ] At Risk [ ] Overdue | [ ] Green [ ] Yellow [ ] Red |
Resource Status
| Resource Type | Planned Hours | Actual Hours | Variance | Availability Concerns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management | ||||
| Consulting | ||||
| Development | ||||
| Technical Architecture | ||||
| Testing/QA | ||||
| Total |
Resource Commentary:
Change Requests
| CR ID | Description | Type | Status | Impact (Schedule/Budget/Scope) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] Scope [ ] Schedule [ ] Budget [ ] Resource |
[ ] Submitted [ ] Under Review [ ] Approved [ ] Rejected [ ] Implemented |
Schedule: ___ Budget: ___ Scope: ___ |
||
| [ ] Scope [ ] Schedule [ ] Budget [ ] Resource |
[ ] Submitted [ ] Under Review [ ] Approved [ ] Rejected [ ] Implemented |
Schedule: ___ Budget: ___ Scope: ___ |
Decisions Needed
List decisions that need to be made by stakeholders, steering committee, or customer:
| Decision Required | Options | Impact if Delayed | Required By | Recommended By PM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Date] | ||||
| [Date] | ||||
| [Date] |
Customer Engagement Summary
Recent Customer Interactions:
| Date | Type | Attendees | Key Topics | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ ] Meeting [ ] Call |
[ ] Positive [ ] Neutral [ ] Negative |
Customer Satisfaction Indicator:
- Very Satisfied
- Satisfied
- Neutral
- Concerned
- Dissatisfied
Comments: _______________________________________
Additional Comments and Observations
Approvals and Distribution
| Role | Name | Date | Signature/Approval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepared By (Project Manager) | |||
| Reviewed By (Project Sponsor) |
Distribution List:
- Project Sponsor
- Steering Committee
- Customer Project Lead
- Swedwise Management Team
- Project Team
- Other: _______________________
Document Control
Report Number: [Sequential - e.g., Report #5 of Project XYZ]
Storage Location: [Project folder/SharePoint location]
Previous Report Date: [Date]
Next Report Due: [Date]
Retention: Retain for duration of project + 2 years minimum
RAG Status Legend
| Color | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Green | On Track | No significant issues. Project proceeding according to plan within acceptable variance thresholds. |
| Yellow | At Risk | Some issues or risks present that could impact objectives if not addressed. Active mitigation in place. Close monitoring required. |
| Red | Off Track | Significant issues impacting schedule, budget, scope, or quality. Immediate action and escalation required. Intervention needed to get back on track. |
Note: Use Yellow as an early warning system. Don't wait until a situation is Red to flag it.
This form supports Swedwise's Quality Management System (ISO 9001) by ensuring consistent project monitoring, transparent communication, and early identification of issues.
Quality Policy
SW-QMS-POL-001
SW-QMS-PRO-003
Document not found
Service Report Template
SW-QMS-FRM-001
Quality Policy
SW-QMS-POL-001
SW-QMS-PRO-003
Document not found
Service Report Template
SW-QMS-FRM-001