SW-IMS-PRO-008
Change Management Procedure
Version
1.0
Owner
IMS Owner
Effective Date
[TBD]
Review Date
[TBD]
Change Management Procedure
Document ID: SW-IMS-PRO-008-v1.0
Effective Date: [TBD]
Review Date: [TBD]
Owner: IMS Owner
Approved by: [TBD]
1. Purpose
This procedure establishes how Swedwise manages changes to systems, services, processes, and infrastructure to ensure:
- Changes are planned, assessed, and approved before implementation
- Risks and impacts are understood and mitigated
- Service continuity is maintained during changes
- Changes do not introduce unintended consequences
- Stakeholders are informed and prepared for changes
- Failed changes can be rolled back safely
- Lessons are learned and applied to future changes
2. Scope
This procedure applies to changes affecting:
Technical Changes:
- IT systems and infrastructure (servers, networks, platforms)
- SaaS services (Swedwise Communications platform, customer-facing services)
- Software applications and configurations
- Security controls and access policies
- Data structures and integrations
Operational Changes:
- IMS policies and procedures
- Service delivery processes
- Customer communication and support processes
- Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
Organizational Changes:
- Organizational structure and reporting relationships
- Roles and responsibilities
- Office locations and facilities
- Supplier and partner relationships
Exclusions:
- Minor documentation updates (typos, formatting) - follow Document Control Procedure (SW-IMS-PRO-001)
- Pre-approved routine maintenance (covered by standard changes, see Section 5.1)
- Customer project delivery work (unless affecting shared infrastructure or services)
3. Definitions
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Change | Addition, modification, or removal of anything that could affect IT services or operations. |
| Change Request (CR) | Formal proposal for a change, documented and submitted for assessment. |
| Standard Change | Pre-approved, low-risk, routine change following documented procedure. |
| Normal Change | Non-routine change requiring assessment, approval, and planning. |
| Emergency Change | Urgent change required to resolve critical incident or security threat. |
| Change Advisory Board (CAB) | Group that assesses and approves significant changes. |
| Change Owner | Person responsible for planning and implementing a change. |
| Change Authority | Person or group authorized to approve changes (varies by change category). |
| Impact Assessment | Analysis of how change will affect services, users, systems, and processes. |
| Rollback Plan | Documented procedure to restore previous state if change fails. |
| Change Window | Scheduled time period for implementing changes, typically low-usage period. |
| Post-Implementation Review (PIR) | Evaluation after change to confirm success and capture lessons learned. |
4. Change Management Principles
Risk-Based Approach:
- Changes are assessed for risk (likelihood and impact of failure)
- Approval level and rigor proportional to risk
- High-risk changes require more planning, testing, and approval
Minimize Service Disruption:
- Changes scheduled during low-usage periods when possible
- Customer notification for changes affecting SaaS services
- Rollback plans prepared for all significant changes
Stakeholder Communication:
- Affected parties informed in advance
- Clear communication of change purpose, timing, and impact
- Feedback mechanisms for concerns or issues
Testing and Validation:
- Changes tested in non-production environments when feasible
- Validation criteria defined before implementation
- Post-change verification confirms success
Continuous Improvement:
- Lessons learned from changes (successful and failed)
- Metrics tracked to improve change success rate
- Process improvements based on experience
5. Change Categories
5.1 Standard Changes
Definition: Pre-approved, low-risk, routine changes following documented procedures.
Characteristics:
- Well-understood, low risk, proven method
- Implemented frequently with predictable outcomes
- No CAB approval required (pre-authorized)
- Documented standard operating procedure exists
- Example triggers: recurring events, routine maintenance
Examples:
| Standard Change | Procedure | Frequency | Approval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security patch deployment (non-critical systems) | Apply vendor patches to test environment, then production after 48 hours | Monthly patch cycle | IT Lead |
| User account creation/modification | Follow access control procedure | As needed | Manager approval + IT |
| SSL certificate renewal | Renew certificate 30 days before expiry | Annually per certificate | IT Lead |
| Backup schedule adjustment | Modify backup jobs per documented process | As needed | IT Lead |
| Standard software version upgrade (internal tools) | Test in staging, deploy to production | Quarterly | IT Lead |
Process:
- Change Owner identifies standard change need
- Follows documented standard procedure
- Logs change in Change Log (for tracking and audit)
- Implements change
- Verifies success
- Updates Change Log with outcome
No formal Change Request required, but change must be logged for audit trail.
5.2 Normal Changes
Definition: Non-routine changes requiring formal assessment, approval, and planning.
Characteristics:
- Not pre-approved; requires evaluation
- Moderate to high risk or complexity
- Affects multiple users, systems, or services
- Requires CAB or management approval
- Detailed planning and testing required
Examples:
- New SaaS service feature deployment
- Major software version upgrades
- Infrastructure changes (server replacement, network reconfiguration)
- New integration between systems
- Significant policy or procedure changes
- Organizational restructuring
- New supplier onboarding affecting operations
Process: See Section 6 (Normal Change Process).
5.3 Emergency Changes
Definition: Urgent changes required to resolve critical incidents or security threats.
Characteristics:
- Implemented urgently to restore service or address security threat
- Cannot wait for normal approval process
- Highest priority, expedited process
- Approval by Emergency Change Authority (CEO or designated)
- Retrospective CAB review (after implementation)
Examples:
- Emergency security patch (actively exploited vulnerability)
- Service restoration after critical outage
- Data breach containment actions
- Critical infrastructure failure requiring immediate replacement
Process: See Section 7 (Emergency Change Process).
Important: Emergency changes still require documentation and approval, but process is expedited. Do not bypass documentation.
6. Normal Change Process
6.1 Step 1 - Change Request Initiation
Who: Anyone can request a change (employee, manager, customer, supplier, IMS Owner).
How: Submit Change Request Form (SW-IMS-FRM-011) with:
Required Information:
- Change Title: Brief descriptive title
- Change Owner: Person responsible for implementing change
- Requested By: Person requesting change (if different from owner)
- Business Justification: Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve?
- Description: Detailed description of the change
- Scope: What systems, services, processes, or people are affected?
- Proposed Timeline: Desired implementation date and duration
- Category: Technical, Operational, Organizational
- Priority: Critical, High, Medium, Low (see Section 6.2)
Submission: Submit to IMS Owner or designated Change Manager.
Acknowledgment: Change Request logged and acknowledged within 1 business day.
6.2 Step 2 - Change Prioritization
IMS Owner or Change Manager assigns priority based on:
| Priority | Criteria | Response Time | CAB Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Addresses critical business need; tight deadline; regulatory requirement | Assess within 1 day | Next CAB meeting (expedited if urgent) |
| High | Significant business benefit; clear deadline; affects key services | Assess within 3 days | Next CAB meeting |
| Medium | Moderate benefit; flexible timeline; limited impact | Assess within 1 week | Next CAB meeting |
| Low | Nice to have; no deadline; minimal impact | Assess within 2 weeks | Batched for CAB review |
6.3 Step 3 - Impact and Risk Assessment
Change Owner conducts assessment with support from IMS Owner and subject matter experts:
Impact Assessment
Questions to Answer:
- Services: Which services will be affected? How (outage, degradation, enhancement)?
- Users: Who will be affected? How many users? Internal, external, or both?
- Systems: Which IT systems, applications, or infrastructure are impacted?
- Dependencies: What other systems, processes, or changes depend on this change?
- Timing: Are there constraints (e.g., SaaS change windows, customer maintenance windows)?
- Compliance: Does this affect IMS compliance (quality, environmental, security)?
Risk Assessment
Use IMS Risk Assessment methodology (SW-IMS-PRO-002):
Identify Risks:
- Change fails during implementation
- Unintended consequences (breaks something else)
- Performance degradation
- Security vulnerability introduced
- Data loss or corruption
- Rollback fails (cannot restore previous state)
Assess Likelihood and Impact: Use standard 5x5 risk matrix.
Determine Overall Change Risk Level:
- Low Risk: Likelihood ≤2, Impact ≤2 (Risk Score ≤4)
- Medium Risk: Risk Score 5-9
- High Risk: Risk Score 10-14
- Critical Risk: Risk Score ≥15
Risk Mitigation: Identify actions to reduce risk (testing, backups, rollback plan, training).
Document Assessment
Complete Impact and Risk Assessment section of Change Request Form.
6.4 Step 4 - Change Planning
Change Owner develops detailed Change Implementation Plan:
Plan Contents:
1. Pre-Implementation:
- Prerequisites (e.g., backups completed, dependencies resolved)
- Testing plan and results (if applicable)
- Communication plan (who to notify, when, how)
- Resource requirements (people, tools, budget)
- Approval of dependent changes
2. Implementation Steps:
- Detailed step-by-step procedure
- Responsible person for each step
- Estimated duration for each step
- Verification checkpoints ("test X works before proceeding to step Y")
3. Rollback Plan:
- Trigger criteria for rollback (under what conditions do we abort?)
- Rollback procedure (step-by-step to restore previous state)
- Rollback responsibility (who executes)
- Recovery time estimate
4. Post-Implementation:
- Verification tests (how to confirm change was successful)
- Monitoring plan (what to monitor, for how long)
- Documentation updates required (configuration docs, user guides)
- Post-Implementation Review (PIR) date (typically 7-30 days after)
5. Communication Plan:
- Who needs to be notified (users, customers, management, suppliers)
- Notification timing (advance notice, go-live notification, completion)
- Notification content and channels
Change Window Selection:
For SaaS services and shared infrastructure, changes should occur during designated change windows:
Standard Change Windows (example - adjust based on SaaS service usage patterns):
- Weekly Maintenance Window: Wednesdays 22:00-02:00 (CET) - for low-risk changes
- Monthly Extended Window: First Sunday 00:00-06:00 (CET) - for higher-risk changes
- Emergency: Anytime, with customer notification
SaaS Service Change Windows (Swedwise Communications Platform):
For services with customer SLA commitments, changes must occur during designated change windows unless emergency change procedure is followed:
| Window Type | Schedule | Duration | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weekly Maintenance | Saturday 18:00-20:00 CET | 2 hours | Low-risk changes (patches, configuration tweaks) |
| Monthly Extended | Saturday 18:00 - Sunday 02:00 CET | 8 hours | Higher-risk changes (version upgrades, infrastructure) |
| Emergency | Anytime | As required | Critical incidents or security vulnerabilities only |
Note: SaaS change windows are specified in customer-facing Service Description (SW-SAAS-SVC-001) and form part of SLA commitments.
Customer Notification Requirements (for SaaS services):
- Planned Maintenance (no service impact): 3 business days advance notice
- Service Disruption (brief outage): 5 business days advance notice
- Major Changes (extended outage, significant feature change): 10 business days advance notice
- Emergency: Immediate notification, ongoing updates
6.5 Step 5 - Change Approval
Changes are approved by appropriate authority based on risk and impact:
Change Advisory Board (CAB)
Composition (core members):
- IMS Owner (Chair)
- CISO (for security-related changes)
- IT Lead or SaaS Operations Lead (for technical changes)
- Department Head(s) representing affected areas
- Change Owner (presents change request)
- Subject matter experts (invited as needed)
Frequency: Bi-weekly meetings (or weekly during periods of high change activity)
Quorum: At least 3 core members including IMS Owner or designated deputy
Approval Authorities
| Change Risk Level | Impact | Approval Authority | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low Risk | Limited (single user, minor system) | Change Owner + IMS Owner | Offline approval (within 2 days) |
| Medium Risk | Moderate (team, non-critical system) | CAB | Next CAB meeting |
| High Risk | Significant (department, critical system, SaaS service) | CAB + Management Team representative | CAB recommendation + Management approval |
| Critical Risk | Severe (organization-wide, major outage risk, high cost) | CAB + Management Team approval | CAB recommendation + Management Team meeting |
CAB Review Criteria
CAB evaluates each change request based on:
- Business justification: Is the benefit clear and worthwhile?
- Risk assessment: Are risks identified and mitigated adequately?
- Impact assessment: Are all affected parties and systems identified?
- Implementation plan: Is the plan detailed, realistic, and complete?
- Rollback plan: Can we recover if the change fails?
- Resource availability: Do we have people, tools, and time to implement?
- Dependencies: Are there conflicts with other planned changes?
- Timing: Is the proposed timing appropriate (change window, business calendar)?
CAB Decisions
CAB can:
- Approve: Change is approved; proceed with implementation
- Approve with Conditions: Approve if specific conditions met (e.g., additional testing)
- Defer: Request more information or planning; reschedule for next CAB
- Reject: Change does not justify risk or cost; do not proceed
Documentation: CAB decisions documented in Change Request record and CAB meeting minutes.
6.6 Step 6 - Change Implementation
Once approved:
Pre-Implementation:
- Confirm Prerequisites: Verify all pre-conditions met (backups, dependencies, resources)
- Final Communication: Notify affected parties per communication plan
- Readiness Check: Change Owner confirms ready to proceed
- Go/No-Go Decision: Final confirmation from IMS Owner or CAB Chair
During Implementation:
- Execute Implementation Plan: Follow documented steps
- Document Progress: Log actions, timestamps, issues encountered
- Monitor for Issues: Watch for errors, performance degradation, unexpected behavior
- Decision Points: At checkpoints, verify success before continuing
- Abort if Necessary: If rollback trigger criteria met, execute rollback plan
Communication During Implementation:
- Notify stakeholders when implementation begins
- Provide updates if duration longer than expected
- Escalate immediately if issues encountered
Responsibility: Change Owner implements change; IMS Owner or designee available for support/escalation.
6.7 Step 7 - Post-Implementation Verification
Immediately after implementation:
Verification Tests:
- Run defined verification tests to confirm change successful
- Check that systems, services, and integrations function as expected
- Verify no unintended consequences (nothing else broken)
- Confirm rollback plan still viable (can still roll back if late issue discovered)
Monitoring:
- Enhanced monitoring for defined period (e.g., 24-72 hours)
- Watch for errors, performance issues, user complaints
- Alert Change Owner and IMS Owner if issues detected
Communication:
- Notify stakeholders of successful completion
- Provide new documentation or instructions if applicable
- Thank participants and acknowledge effort
Update Change Record:
- Mark change as "Implemented" with timestamp
- Document any deviations from plan
- Note any issues encountered and resolution
- Schedule Post-Implementation Review (PIR)
6.8 Step 8 - Post-Implementation Review (PIR)
Timing: 7-30 days after implementation (based on change complexity)
Participants: Change Owner, IMS Owner, key stakeholders
Review Questions:
- Objectives Achieved? Did the change deliver intended benefits?
- Success? Did implementation go as planned? Any issues?
- User Satisfaction? Are users satisfied with the change?
- Performance? Is system/service performing as expected?
- Unintended Consequences? Any negative impacts discovered?
- Lessons Learned? What went well? What could be improved?
- Follow-Up Actions? Any additional changes or fixes needed?
Documentation:
- PIR findings documented in Change Record
- Lessons learned shared with team and incorporated into future changes
- Process improvements identified and implemented
Closure:
- If change successful and no follow-up needed: Mark change as "Closed"
- If follow-up required: Create new Change Request(s) for remaining work
7. Emergency Change Process
7.1 When to Use Emergency Process
Use emergency change process ONLY when:
- Critical service outage affecting customers or business operations
- Active security threat requiring immediate action (e.g., zero-day exploit)
- Data integrity or confidentiality at immediate risk
- Regulatory or legal requirement with immediate deadline
- Waiting for normal approval process would cause unacceptable harm
Do NOT use emergency process for:
- Convenience or impatience
- Poor planning (should have been normal change)
- Management pressure without true emergency criteria
7.2 Emergency Change Process Steps
Step 1: Declare Emergency Change (within 15 minutes)
- Change Owner or Incident Manager identifies need for emergency change
- Notify Emergency Change Authority: IMS Owner, CISO (for security), or CEO (if others unavailable)
- Brief verbal approval to proceed (follow up with documentation)
Step 2: Rapid Assessment (within 30 minutes)
- Quick impact and risk assessment (abbreviated)
- Identify immediate risks of implementing vs. not implementing
- Confirm emergency criteria met
Step 3: Emergency Approval
- Emergency Change Authority (priority order):
- IMS Owner + CISO (for technical/security emergencies)
- Management Team representative (if IMS Owner/CISO unavailable)
- CEO (if none of above available or if organization-wide impact)
- Approval can be verbal initially; documented within 4 hours
- Minimum approval: 1 Emergency Change Authority member
Step 4: Implement Change
- Execute change with available resources (all-hands-on-deck if needed)
- Document actions taken (even brief notes)
- Communicate to affected stakeholders ASAP
- Monitor for immediate issues
Step 5: Post-Implementation
- Verify change resolved emergency
- Confirm no critical new issues introduced
- Notify stakeholders of resolution
Step 6: Retrospective CAB Review (within 5 business days)
- Present emergency change to CAB for retrospective review
- Assess: Was emergency classification justified?
- Review implementation and outcomes
- Identify improvements for future emergencies
- Document in CAB minutes
Step 7: Follow-Up
- If emergency change was temporary fix: Plan permanent solution (normal change)
- Post-Implementation Review (within 14 days)
- Update procedures if lessons learned
7.3 Emergency Change Documentation
Even in emergencies, document:
- Change Request Form (SW-IMS-FRM-011) - completed during or immediately after implementation
- What changed, why, who approved, when implemented
- Actions taken (step-by-step or summary)
- Outcome and verification
- Any issues or risks introduced
Retrospective documentation is acceptable for true emergencies, but must be completed within 24 hours.
8. Change Freeze Periods
Definition: Periods when changes are prohibited or heavily restricted to ensure stability.
When to Implement Change Freeze:
- Business-Critical Periods: Major customer deliveries, fiscal year-end, public sector procurement deadlines
- Holiday Periods: Limited staff availability (e.g., Christmas/New Year, summer vacation)
- Pre/Post Major Changes: Freeze before and after significant changes to allow stabilization
- Audit Periods: During external audits or certification assessments
Change Freeze Policy:
- Hard Freeze: No changes except critical emergency changes
- Soft Freeze: Normal changes discouraged; CAB approval required for all changes (no standard changes)
Communication: Change freeze periods communicated at least 30 days in advance.
Emergency Changes During Freeze: Allowed if meet emergency criteria; CEO or designee approval required.
9. Failed Change and Rollback
9.1 Rollback Decision Criteria
Rollback (revert change) if:
- Change does not pass verification tests
- Critical functionality broken
- Performance degradation beyond acceptable threshold
- Security vulnerability introduced
- Unable to complete implementation within change window
- Change Owner or IMS Owner determines risk too high to continue
Decision: Change Owner makes rollback decision in consultation with IMS Owner or CAB Chair (if available).
9.2 Rollback Execution
- Announce Rollback: Notify stakeholders that change is being rolled back
- Execute Rollback Plan: Follow documented rollback procedure
- Verify Rollback: Confirm service restored to pre-change state
- Incident Management: If service outage occurred, follow Incident Management Procedure (SW-IMS-PRO-003)
- Document: Record rollback in Change Record with reason
9.3 Post-Rollback Actions
- Root Cause Analysis: Understand why change failed
- Revise Change Plan: Address issues before re-attempting
- Re-submit for Approval: If change still needed, submit revised Change Request
- Lessons Learned: Share findings with team; improve process
Do NOT:
- Attempt to re-implement immediately without understanding failure
- Blame individuals; focus on process and technical issues
10. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| IMS Owner | - Chair Change Advisory Board (CAB) - Maintain change management process - Log and track all changes - Approve low-risk changes - Emergency Change Authority (with CISO) - Report change metrics to management - Coordinate change freeze periods |
| Change Advisory Board (CAB) | - Review and approve normal changes - Assess change risks and priorities - Identify change conflicts and dependencies - Retrospectively review emergency changes - Recommend process improvements |
| Change Owner | - Initiate Change Request - Conduct impact and risk assessment - Develop implementation and rollback plans - Implement approved changes - Verify change success - Document change activities - Conduct Post-Implementation Review |
| CISO | - CAB member for security-related changes - Assess security impact of all changes - Emergency Change Authority (for security emergencies) - Approve changes affecting security controls |
| IT Lead / SaaS Operations Lead | - CAB member for technical changes - Provide technical expertise and feasibility input - Coordinate technical change implementation - Manage change windows and scheduling - Monitor system stability post-change |
| Department Heads | - Request changes aligned with business needs - CAB member representing their area - Approve changes affecting their departments - Communicate changes to their teams - Provide resources for change implementation |
| Management Team | - Approve high and critical risk changes - Allocate resources for significant changes - Review change performance metrics - Set change freeze periods based on business calendar |
| All Employees | - Request changes when needs identified - Provide input to impact assessments - Follow change procedures - Report issues encountered post-change |
11. Change Management for SaaS Services
11.1 SaaS Service Change Categories
For Swedwise Communications SaaS and other SaaS offerings:
Infrastructure Changes:
- Kubernetes cluster updates
- Database version upgrades
- Network or firewall configuration changes
- Monitoring and logging system changes
Application Changes:
- OpenText Communications (Exstream) version upgrades
- Notification service updates (email, SMS gateway changes)
- API changes
- Configuration changes affecting multiple customers
Customer-Specific Changes:
- Individual customer configuration changes
- Template updates for single customer
- Customer onboarding/offboarding
11.2 SaaS Change Windows
Standard Maintenance Windows:
- Weekly: Wednesday 22:00-02:00 CET (4-hour window)
- Low-risk changes (patches, configuration tweaks)
- Brief service interruptions acceptable (<15 minutes)
- Monthly Extended: First Sunday 00:00-06:00 CET (6-hour window)
- Higher-risk changes (version upgrades, infrastructure changes)
- Longer service interruptions if needed (<2 hours)
Emergency: Anytime, with immediate customer notification
Customer SLA Considerations:
- SLA uptime target: 99.9% (allows ~43 minutes downtime/month)
- Planned maintenance excluded from SLA downtime
- Advance notice requirements per SLA (5-10 business days)
11.3 SaaS Customer Communication for Changes
Planned Maintenance Notification:
Timing:
- 10 business days advance notice: Major changes (>1 hour downtime or significant feature change)
- 5 business days advance notice: Standard changes (15-60 minutes downtime)
- 3 business days advance notice: Minor changes (no downtime or <15 minutes)
Content:
- Change description (what is changing, why)
- Maintenance window (date, time, timezone, duration)
- Expected impact (service availability, performance, functionality)
- Actions required by customer (if any)
- Contact information for questions
Channels:
- Email to designated customer contacts (primary)
- Service status page update (if available)
- In-application banner (if applicable)
Emergency Changes:
- Immediate notification when emergency declared
- Updates every 2 hours during extended incidents
- Resolution notification
11.4 Multi-Tenant Change Considerations
For SaaS platforms serving multiple customers:
Testing:
- Test in isolated staging environment that mirrors production
- Validate with sample customer configurations
- Consider impact on all tenant configurations (not just one customer)
Rollback:
- Ensure rollback does not affect customer data integrity
- Test rollback procedure in staging
- Prepare customer communication for rollback scenario
Incremental Rollout (if feasible):
- Deploy to subset of customers first (e.g., pilot customers)
- Monitor for issues before rolling out to all
- Staged rollout reduces blast radius if issues occur
12. Change Metrics and Reporting
12.1 Key Performance Indicators
| Metric | Target | Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change Success Rate | ≥95% | Monthly | Measure implementation quality |
| Emergency Change Rate | <10% of all changes | Quarterly | Identify poor planning; should be rare |
| Changes Rolled Back | <5% of changes | Monthly | Measure implementation quality and planning |
| Unauthorized Changes | Zero | Continuous | Ensure process compliance |
| Average Change Lead Time | <14 days (normal changes) | Quarterly | Measure process efficiency |
| CAB Meeting Attendance | ≥80% | Per meeting | Ensure adequate review participation |
| PIR Completion Rate | 100% (for medium+ risk changes) | Quarterly | Ensure learning from changes |
12.2 Change Reporting
Monthly Change Report (prepared by IMS Owner):
- Total changes implemented (by category: standard, normal, emergency)
- Change success rate and failures
- Changes in progress and pending approval
- Upcoming significant changes
- Issues and trends
Audience: Management Team, CAB
Quarterly Change Review (in IMS Management Review):
- Change metrics and trends
- Lessons learned from major changes
- Process improvements implemented
- Change freeze periods planned
- Resource adequacy for change management
13. Records to Maintain
| Record | Retention Period | Location | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change Request Forms (all changes) | 3 years | [TBD - Change Management System] | IMS Owner |
| Change Implementation Plans | 3 years | [TBD] | Change Owner |
| CAB Meeting Minutes | 5 years | [TBD] | IMS Owner |
| Change Log (master record of all changes) | 5 years | [TBD] | IMS Owner |
| Post-Implementation Review reports | 3 years | [TBD] | Change Owner |
| Emergency Change Approvals | 5 years | [TBD] | IMS Owner |
| Rollback Execution Records | 3 years | [TBD] | Change Owner |
| Change Metrics Reports | 5 years | [TBD] | IMS Owner |
14. Related Documents
- SW-IMS-POL-001 - Integrated Management System Policy
- SW-ISMS-POL-001 - Information Security Policy
- SW-IMS-PRO-001 - Document Control Procedure
- SW-IMS-PRO-002 - Risk Assessment Procedure
- SW-IMS-PRO-003 - Incident Management Procedure
- SW-IMS-PRO-007 - Communication Procedure
- SW-IMS-FRM-011 - Change Request Form
- SW-IMS-FRM-012 - Change Impact and Risk Assessment Template
- SW-IMS-FRM-013 - Post-Implementation Review Template
15. Continuous Improvement
This procedure is subject to continuous improvement based on:
- Change success rates and failure analysis
- Post-Implementation Review findings
- CAB feedback and recommendations
- Incident reviews (changes causing incidents)
- Audit findings
- Industry best practices (ITIL, ISO 20000)
Suggestions for improvement should be submitted to the IMS Owner.
Appendix A: Change Request Form Template
Document ID: SW-IMS-FRM-011
Change Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Change ID | [Auto-assigned by IMS Owner] |
| Change Title | |
| Change Owner | |
| Requested By | [If different from owner] |
| Date Requested | |
| Change Category | ☐ Standard ☐ Normal ☐ Emergency |
| Priority | ☐ Critical ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low |
Business Justification
Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve or opportunity does it enable?
Change Description
Detailed description of what will change:
Systems/Services/Processes Affected:
Impact Assessment
| Area | Impact Description | Severity (Low/Medium/High) |
|---|---|---|
| Services | ||
| Users (how many, who) | ||
| Systems | ||
| Dependencies | ||
| Compliance/IMS |
Estimated Downtime/Disruption: _____________
Risk Assessment
Identified Risks:
| Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Risk Score | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Change Risk Level: ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High ☐ Critical
Implementation Plan
Proposed Implementation Date/Time: _____________
Change Window: ☐ Weekly Maintenance ☐ Monthly Extended ☐ Emergency ☐ Other: _______
Duration Estimate: _____________
Implementation Steps (high-level):
Testing Plan:
Rollback Plan:
Rollback Trigger Criteria:
Communication Plan
Who needs to be notified?
Notification timing and content:
Resources Required
People: _____________________________________________
Tools/Budget: _____________________________________________
Prerequisites: _____________________________________________
Approval Section
| Role | Name | Decision | Date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMS Owner | ☐ Approve ☐ Defer ☐ Reject | |||
| CAB | ☐ Approve ☐ Defer ☐ Reject | |||
| Management (if required) | ☐ Approve ☐ Defer ☐ Reject |
Implementation Section
Implementation Date/Time: _____________
Implemented By: _____________
Outcome: ☐ Success ☐ Failed (Rolled Back) ☐ Partial Success
Issues Encountered:
Verification Results:
Post-Implementation Review
PIR Date: _____________
Objectives Achieved? ☐ Yes ☐ Partially ☐ No
Lessons Learned:
Follow-Up Actions (if any):
Change Status: ☐ Closed ☐ Follow-Up Required
Appendix B: CAB Meeting Agenda Template
Date: _____________
Time: _____________
Chair: IMS Owner
Attendees:
- IMS Owner
- CISO
- IT Lead / SaaS Operations Lead
- Department Head(s): _____________
- Change Owners (as needed)
Agenda
1. Review of Previous Meeting Actions (5 minutes)
- Status of action items from last meeting
2. Change Metrics Review (5 minutes)
- Changes implemented since last meeting (success/failure)
- Changes currently in progress
- Trends and issues
3. Standard Changes Review (5 minutes)
- Review log of standard changes implemented
- Identify any patterns or issues
- Confirm standard changes remain appropriate
4. Normal Changes for Approval (30-45 minutes)
For each change:
- Change Owner presents Change Request
- Q&A and discussion (risks, impacts, dependencies)
- CAB decision: Approve / Approve with Conditions / Defer / Reject
Changes for Review:
| Change ID | Title | Owner | Risk Level | Requested Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5. Emergency Changes Retrospective Review (10 minutes)
- Review emergency changes implemented since last meeting
- Assess: Was emergency classification justified?
- Lessons learned
6. Upcoming Changes and Change Calendar (5 minutes)
- Preview changes planned for next period
- Identify potential conflicts or resource constraints
- Confirm change freeze periods
7. Process Improvements and AOB (5 minutes)
- Suggestions for improving change management
- Any other business
Next Meeting: _____________
Action Items:
| Action | Responsible | Due Date |
|---|---|---|
Appendix C: Change Risk Assessment Quick Reference
Use this guide to quickly assess change risk level:
Likelihood of Failure (1-5)
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 - Rare | Proven change; implemented many times successfully; well-understood |
| 2 - Unlikely | Implemented before with minor issues; good understanding |
| 3 - Possible | New but tested; moderate complexity; some unknowns |
| 4 - Likely | Complex; limited testing; significant unknowns; dependencies |
| 5 - Almost Certain | Highly complex; unproven; many unknowns; high technical risk |
Impact if Failure Occurs (1-5)
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 - Negligible | Single user affected; workaround available; <1 hour disruption |
| 2 - Minor | Small team affected; <4 hours disruption; no customer impact |
| 3 - Moderate | Department affected; 4-8 hours disruption; some customer impact; workaround available |
| 4 - Major | Organization-wide or SaaS service affected; >8 hours disruption; significant customer impact; SLA breach |
| 5 - Critical | Business-critical failure; >24 hours disruption; major customer impact; data loss risk; regulatory breach |
Overall Risk Level
Risk Score = Likelihood × Impact
| Risk Level | Score Range | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| Low | 1-4 | IMS Owner approval; standard planning |
| Medium | 5-9 | CAB approval; detailed planning and testing |
| High | 10-14 | CAB + Management approval; extensive planning, testing, rollback plan |
| Critical | 15-25 | Management Team approval; full rigor; consider alternatives |
Document Control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | [TBD] | [Author] | Initial release |
Approval
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMS Owner | |||
| CISO | |||
| Management Team Representative |